JBMedia

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Federal shutdown effects ripple across NC :: WRAL.com

Federal shutdown effects ripple across NC :: WRAL.com
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
From Fort Bragg to Research Triangle Park, from the Blue Ridge Parkway to the Outer Banks, North Carolina quickly felt the squeeze Tuesday of the federal government's partial shutdown during a budget impasse.
Hundreds of civilian workers on Fort Bragg were told to go home at noon. While military personnel are considered essential for national security and will remain on duty, about half of the post's 14,500 civilian employees were furloughed.
The remaining Fort Bragg civilian workers perform "life, health and safety functions," spokesman Tom McCollum said, citing first responders, physicians and workers directly involved in troop readiness. Defense contractors, he said, won't be affected.
Womack Army Medical Center will remain open, but elective medical procedures will be limited. All Fort Bragg schools will operate as usual. The VA Medical Centers in Fayetteville and Durham will continue to provide inpatient and outpatient care and dental care, but some of the VA's call centers will be closed.
Camp Lejeune also shut down its non-essential operations and sent many of its civilian employees home.
Tiffany Lawson, an employment readiness specialist at Fort Bragg, called the furlough "ridiculous," noting that she had to take six days off without pay in recent months because of automatic federal budget cuts, known as the sequester.
"We still have not recovered from (that), and then to be hit with this," said Lawson, a mother of four. "It's worse because you didn't know it was coming."
Jay Steele, president of the federal employees union at Fort Bragg, said employees had several months notice with the sequester.
"This time around, there was not a 30-day formal notice process or even three months. This was pretty quick," Steele said.

Col. Jeffery Sanborn, garrison commander at Fort Bragg, said most service cutbacks won't be noticed by the general public.
"There is no way around this," Sanborn said in a statement. "Everyone will be affected by this furlough. We will do everything we can to ensure our units, soldiers, their families, our civilian workforce and retirees are supported to the best of our abilities."
Lawson disagrees with the idea that the public won't notice any change.
"When I went to work this morning, you know, people are coming expecting to get services," she said. "They don't care or don't understand that there's a government shutdown. They want what they want when they want it."
In RTP, most of the 2,000 workers and contractors at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency left the complex of research labs and offices – the largest EPA facility outside of Washington, D.C. – at noon and won't return until the budget battle on Capitol Hill is resolved.
The EPA facility handles research in fields ranging from pollution to exposure to chemicals to Department of Homeland Security projects, and officials at area universities expressed concern that the shutdown could ripple through their EPA-related research as well.
RTI International officials were trying to assess the impact of the shutdown on their operations. RTI handles numerous federal grants for research.

Gov. Pat McCrory said his staff also was trying to get a handle on the effects of the shutdown, noting that the state Department of Health and Human Services would get pinched the most because it works on projects that are either fully or partially paid for with federal dollars. The Division of Employment Security also would be affected, he said.
"We have two major goals," McCrory told the Council of State. "We've got to make sure that functions that are critical remain open, and yet, at the same time, we have to make sure we aren't spending money the state doesn't have."
If the shutdown lasts more than a week or two, food assistance to needy families also could be in trouble, officials said.
Some items not affected by the shutdown: The Postal Service, which doesn't rely on government appropriations, will operate on a normal schedule. Postal officials said passport applications also won't be delayed.
In the western part of the state, October is one of the busiest months for the Blue Ridge Parkway, as tourists travel along the scenic roadway to see the fall foliage. But the shutdown has closed visitor centers and other staffed facilities, meaning travelers should consider how they plan to do their viewing.
The parkway remains open – the fall colors will peak in the next two weeks – but Tom Hardy, executive director of the Blue Ridge Parkway Association, is worried that some people will think the roadway is shut down.
"You know how bad news is, and unfortunately, there are going to be some people who think the parkway is closed and gated. That is a negative," he said.
That could hurt businesses that depend on tourism. Many visitors stay in motels and bed-and-breakfast inns and shop in communities near the parkway.
Tuesday was the first day of the popular fall fishing season on the North Carolina coast, but the National Park Service locked all gates that provide anglers a way to drive onto the beach along the Cape Hatteras National Seashore.
"It is unfortunate," said Cyndy Holda, spokeswoman for the park service's Outer Banks Group. "Our weather has been wonderful this year: Warm and sunny and good. So, the timing is not good for our fall fishermen at all."
The Cape Hatteras and Bodie Island lighthouses are closed, as is the Wright Brothers Memorial in Kitty Hawk.
Holda said all staffers reported to work Tuesday morning to put messages on their phones or emails saying they will be out of the office because of the federal government shutdown. A few employees will remain on the job, but public facilities will remain closed.
"We don't have staff to run them because we can't pay them. ... Beach access will be closed for all the off-road vehicle ramps, and there is no public access to the beaches today," she said.

Saturday, September 28, 2013

La. Pastor Shot Dead In Front Of Congregation During Church Service | News One

La. Pastor Shot Dead In Front Of Congregation During Church Service | News One
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
A Louisiana pastor was fatally shot as he preached to a crowd of more than 60 during a revival service and a suspect has been arrested, law enforcement officials said Saturday.
The shooting at about 8:20 p.m. Friday was at Tabernacle of Praise Worship Center in Lake Charles, Calcasieu Parish Sheriff’s Office spokeswoman Kim Myers said Saturday. Sixty-five people were inside at the time, including the victim’s wife, said Chief Deputy Stitch Guillory.
Deputies have no information on a motive or on whether the preacher and suspect knew each other, Myers said.
Myers said Pastor Ronald J. Harris Sr., 53, was shot twice by the gunman. The walked into the church while Harris was preaching and shot him, then hit him again when Harris fell to the floor.
The gunman “walked up to him and shot him at close range,” Myers said.
Harris was pronounced dead at the scene.
Woodrow Karey, 53, of Lake Charles is charged with second-degree murder and was held in the parish jail Saturday, Myers said. Karey’s bond has been set at $1 million.
The gunman left the church, but Myers said Karey called the sheriff’s office and surrendered.
Myers said after picking up Karey, deputies found two guns in a wooded area — one was a shotgun, the other a .22-caliber pistol.
Myers said Karey has no known criminal history.
Myers said deputies were “interviewing everybody who was there at the church.”
Family members who answered the telephone Saturday at the Harris home in Lake Charles said there would be no comment. There was no answer at a telephone listing for Karey or at Tabernacle of Praise.
 http://newsone.com/2730204/pastor-killed-pastor-ronald-j-harris-sr/

Shoe thrown as Rouhani home after historic Obama call - Yahoo News

Shoe thrown as Rouhani home after historic Obama call - Yahoo News
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
A shoe was thrown at Iranian President Hassan Rouhani's motorcade Saturday as he arrived home to a mixed reception after his historic call with US President Barack Obama.
Iranian newspapers hailed the first contact with a US president in more than three decades as the ending of a long taboo.
The Etemad newspaper carried a front-page photomontage of Rouhani and Obama side by side. "Historic contact on way home," read its banner headline.
But Rouhani's 15-minute conversation with the leader of a country long derided as the "Great Satan" was too much for some hardliners.
Nearly 60 gathered outside Tehran's Mehrabad Airport, chanting "Death to America" and "Death to Israel" as his motorcade passed.
They were outnumbered by 200 to 300 supporters of the president chanting “Thank you Rouhani”, who were separated from the protesters by police.
The shoe was thrown as Rouhani stood up through the sunroof of his car to acknowledge the crowd. It failed to hit its target.
There have been no diplomatic relations between Tehran and Washington since radical students took hostages at the US embassy in the aftermath of the 1979 revolution.
Dubbed the "nest of spies" by the regime, the old embassy site is the scene of annual commemorations which have been the focal point for hardline anti-US sentiment.
Rouhani told reporters at the airport the call had been Obama's initiative.
“We were going to the airport, when I was informed that the White House had called the cellphone of our ambassador to the UN,” his office quoted him as saying.
“I was informed President Obama wanted to speak to me for a few minutes.”
Iranian media later reported that Rouhani had brought home a 2,700-year-old Persian artefact -- a silver chalice in the shape of a winged Griffin -- given to him as a "special gift" to the Iranian people.
The artefact depicting the mythical eagle-headed lion, worth an estimated one million dollars, was seized by US customs officials from a smuggler in 2003.
'Both sides must be careful'
Iranian newspapers crowed that Rouhani had caught the world's media off guard by taking Obama's call after coverage of his keenly awaited visit to the United Nations in New York had focused on the lack of a face-to-face meeting.
"The world caught unawares," declared reformist daily Arman. "International media in shock over the telephone call."
The call was approved by supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's ultimate authority, according to top lawmaker Hossein Naqavi Hosseini, spokesman for the influential foreign policy commission.
'Both sides must be careful'
The pro-reform Etemad paper carried an opinion piece by international relations professor Mohammad Ali Bassiri warning of the challenges of full rapprochement, not least the opposition of Iranian arch-foe Israel.
"These contacts and meetings between Iran and the United States have extremist opponents and both sides must be very careful," he wrote.
"Many countries, notably the Zionist regime, believe their interests will be jeopardised by a normalisation of relations between Iran and the United States and will seek to stop it."
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has described Rouhani as a "wolf in sheep's clothing", is to meet Obama on Monday.
Former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, widely seen as Rouhani's mentor, said he had pulled off a diplomatic coup by speaking to -- but not meeting -- Obama.
The commander of the covert operations unit of the elite Revolutionary Guards, the Qods force, said the attention lavished on Rouhani in New York was a vindication of Iran's tough defence policy.
"The respect shown by the world to President Rouhani is the fruit of the nation's resistance," General Ghassem Soleimani was quoted as saying.
The Qods Force lies at the centre of US allegations of Iranian state sponsorship of terrorism, one of a raft of issues, over and above Iran's controversial nuclear programme, that Rouhani will have to tackle in any rapprochement.
Many newspapers carried front-page photographs of a smiling Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and US Secretary of State John Kerry at nuclear talks in New York between Iran and the major powers.
Zarif said he hoped for a deal within a year to allay international concerns about Iran's nuclear ambitions, but his Western counterparts made clear that an agreement will require major concessions from Iran.
These include suspending all enrichment of uranium beyond the level required to fuel nuclear power plants, and closing Iran's underground enrichment facility near the central city of Qom.
Back home after all the international fanfare, Rouhani now has to persuade regime sceptics that such concessions are worth making.
 http://news.yahoo.com/shoe-thrown-rouhani-obama-call-102611135.html

Rev. Jesse Jackson in Cuba, hopes to see jailed American | theGrio

Rev. Jesse Jackson in Cuba, hopes to see jailed American | theGrio
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
The Rev. Jesse Jackson traveled to Cuba Friday for talks with the island’s religious leaders and said he hopes to visit Alan Gross, a U.S. government subcontractor serving a 15-year sentence in the Caribbean nation.
In brief comments outside a seaside Havana hotel, Jackson told reporters he intended to meet with local clergy about their concerns for the needs of the poor, and to discuss relations between Cuba, the United States and the rest of the Caribbean.
Asked whether he would meet with Gross, Jackson said: “I would like to.”
Gross was arrested in December 2009 after authorities caught him importing restricted communications equipment into the country.
He said he was only setting up Internet networks for island Jewish groups, but a court convicted him on a statute governing crimes against the state and sentenced him to 15 years.
The case threw already cool U.S.-Cuba relations into a deep freeze, although there have been signs of some thawing this year.
Jackson has traveled to Yugoslavia, Syria and Iraq in the past to help gain freedom for U.S. citizens jailed there.
In March 2011, shortly before Gross’ trial, he appealed to Cuba to release the man on humanitarian grounds and offered to help mediate.
Former President Jimmy Carter came to Havana later that month, but left without Gross.
In September 2011, the former governor of New Mexico and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Bill Richardson, made a high profile visit to try to negotiate Gross’ release.
But the trip abruptly fell apart amid mutual recriminations as Richardson wasn’t even allowed to see Gross, and referred to him in public comments as a “hostage.”
Jackson has visited Cuba on several occasions and met with both former President Fidel Castro and current President Raul Castro. In 1984, he helped negotiate the release of 26 Cuban prisoners. Most of them went into exile.
On Friday, Jackson said he hopes to help continue healing the wounds of a five-decade divide between islanders and exiles.
“It’s good to be back to Cuba again,” Jackson said. “We’ve been here over the years. We have developed kinships with many Cuban-Americans trying to build Cuban-Cuban American family reunification.”
“We hope for the day we will have the walls down, the bridges built,” he said.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Why Ted Cruz will spend the rest of the day speaking on the Senate floor about Obamacare - Yahoo News

Why Ted Cruz will spend the rest of the day speaking on the Senate floor about Obamacare - Yahoo News
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
In a Capitol Hill hallway leading to the Senate floor on Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid had just finished telling reporters that no Republican would delay a vote to fund the government. But then Texas GOP Sen. Ted Cruz, carrying a stack of papers under his arm, strolled past him toward the door of the chamber.

Cruz turned his head toward the gaggle of reporters around Reid and walked through the doors onto the floor, where he stopped at his desk on the far-right corner of the room.
“I intend to speak about defunding Obamacare until I am unable to stand,” he declared.
With his colleague Utah Sen. Mike Lee on his left and an aide on his right, Cruz began what is expected to be an hourslong speech that could last late into the night about the importance of gutting the federal health care law that President Barack Obama signed in 2010.
Cruz’s move has all the looks of an old-fashioned filibuster, but it’s technically just a very long speech that will draw attention and focus to his cause. In this case, he will be delaying a vote on a bill to fund the government that, when the Democrat-controlled Senate is finished with it, will include funding for the health care law, but he won't derail it. According to Reid's spokesman Adam Jentleson, Cruz "negotiated the terms" of his speech with the Democratic majority leader before taking the floor.

Congress must approve a bill that sets federal spending rates by Oct. 1, or the government will shut down. For months, Cruz and a small group of conservative Republicans have called on their party to refuse to fund the government unless spending on the president's signature domestic policy win is stripped, even if it means shutting down the government.

Among Republicans in the upper chamber, there aren't many takers.
At about the same time that Cruz began his speech, Senate Republican Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who doesn’t support the Texas lawmaker's filibuster-esque strategy, voiced clear disapproval with the delay tactic. Without Cruz’s objection, Senate Republicans could have given up their time to debate the funding bill, which would have sped up the voting process.
Because Cruz chose to use up most of that time, the Senate won’t be able to return its version of the funding bill back to the House until Sunday night — just a day before the shutdown deadline — eliminating the leverage House Republicans might have had in the debate.
“It would be to the advantage to our colleagues in the House who are in the majority to shorten the process, and if the majority leader were to ask us to shorten the process, I would not object,” McConnell told reporters in the first moments of Cruz’s speech. “I don’t know who else in the conference may feel differently. But I do know that if the House doesn’t get what we send over until Monday, they’re in a pretty tough spot.”
When House lawmakers return to Capitol Hill that day, they will be asked to vote on what the Senate has sent them: a government spending bill that includes funding for Obamacare. They will have a choice to whether pass the bill as is, or change it and send it back to the Senate and risk a shutdown.
If the bar for success is actually defunding Obamacare, Cruz's effort is almost sure to fail. Senate Democrats and the president have made clear they will not approve any legislation that defunds the law, even if it means bringing the nation to the brink of a shutdown.
But that’s really not the point.
By making himself into a stalwart on the issue who is at odds with members of his own party on the approach, Cruz is setting himself up to be a hero of the party’s conservative base who want lawmakers to eliminate the health care law at all costs.
To that end, Cruz’s exercise will be a success.
 http://news.yahoo.com/ted-cruz-filibuster-obamacare-194126361.html

Friday, September 20, 2013

Raleigh residents feel forced out | abc11.com

Raleigh residents feel forced out | abc11.com
Raleigh continues to be a hot spot for developers, but new plans could force some residents out of the places they call home.
The Washington Terrace Apartments are up for sale and in a 62-page proposal package to potential buyers mentions "modern gentrification." The packet offers a graph with how rent can increase almost 200 percent in the next few years.
Kierra Barbour just moved into the neighborhood and says she is frustrated.
"I think it's pitiful, that people are so selfish to not think about people. It's sad that they don't take other people's lives into consideration. They putting black folks out of their homes," Barbour said.
Barbour isn't the only one angry at developers.
"What they're doing is steering to a higher income bracket and they're getting priced out and shut out," said community activist Octavia Rainey. "I think when they do build these high end condos, everyone around here won't have any place to stay."
Raleigh Mayor Nancy McFarlane said it's a tough give and take.
"It's always a difficult balance, we want to see areas revitalized economically but we want to make sure all levels of income have housing," McFarlane said.
Raleigh Mayor Nancy McFarlane said it's a tough give and take.
"It's always a difficult balance, we want to see areas revitalized economically but we want to make sure all levels of income have housing," McFarlane said.

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Brazil looks to break from US-centric Internet - Yahoo News

Brazil looks to break from US-centric Internet - Yahoo News
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
Brazil plans to divorce itself from the U.S.-centric Internet over Washington's widespread online spying, a move that many experts fear will be a potentially dangerous first step toward fracturing a global network built with minimal interference by governments.
President Dilma Rousseff ordered a series of measures aimed at greater Brazilian online independence and security following revelations that the U.S. National Security Agency intercepted her communications, hacked into the state-owned Petrobras oil company's network and spied on Brazilians who entrusted their personal data to U.S. tech companies such as Facebook and Google.
The leader is so angered by the espionage that on Tuesday she postponed next month's scheduled trip to Washington, where she was to be honored with a state dinner.
Internet security and policy experts say the Brazilian government's reaction to information leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden is understandable, but warn it could set the Internet on a course of Balkanization.
"The global backlash is only beginning and will get far more severe in coming months," said Sascha Meinrath, director of the Open Technology Institute at the Washington-based New America Foundation think tank. "This notion of national privacy sovereignty is going to be an increasingly salient issue around the globe."
While Brazil isn't proposing to bar its citizens from U.S.-based Web services, it wants their data to be stored locally as the nation assumes greater control over Brazilians' Internet use to protect them from NSA snooping.
The danger of mandating that kind of geographic isolation, Meinrath said, is that it could render inoperable popular software applications and services and endanger the Internet's open, interconnected structure.
The effort by Latin America's biggest economy to digitally isolate itself from U.S. spying not only could be costly and difficult, it could encourage repressive governments to seek greater technical control over the Internet to crush free expression at home, experts say.
In December, countries advocating greater "cyber-sovereignty" pushed for such control at an International Telecommunications Union meeting in Dubai, with Western democracies led by the United States and the European Union in opposition.
U.S. digital security expert Bruce Schneier says that while Brazil's response is a rational reaction to NSA spying, it is likely to embolden "some of the worst countries out there to seek more control over their citizens' Internet. That's Russia, China, Iran and Syria."
Rousseff says she intends to push for international rules on privacy and security in hardware and software during the U.N. General Assembly meeting later this month. Among Snowden revelations: the NSA has created backdoors in software and Web-based services.
Brazil is now pushing more aggressively than any other nation to end U.S. commercial hegemony on the Internet. More than 80 percent of online search, for example, is controlled by U.S.-based companies.
Most of Brazil's global Internet traffic passes through the United States, so Rousseff's government plans to lay underwater fiber optic cable directly to Europe and also link to all South American nations to create what it hopes will be a network free of U.S. eavesdropping.
More communications integrity protection is expected when Telebras, the state-run telecom company, works with partners to oversee the launch in 2016 of Brazil's first communications satellite, for military and public Internet traffic. Brazil's military currently relies on a satellite run by Embratel, which Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim controls.
Rousseff is urging Brazil's Congress to compel Facebook, Google and all companies to store data generated by Brazilians on servers physically located inside Brazil in order to shield it from the NSA.
If that happens, and other nations follow suit, Silicon Valley's bottom line could be hit by lost business and higher operating costs: Brazilians rank No. 3 on Facebook and No. 2 on Twitter and YouTube. An August study by a respected U.S. technology policy nonprofit estimated the fallout from the NSA spying scandal could cost the U.S. cloud computing industry, which stores data remotely to give users easy access from any device, as much as $35 billion by 2016 in lost business.
Brazil also plans to build more Internet exchange points, places where vast amounts of data are relayed, in order to route Brazilians' traffic away from potential interception.
And its postal service plans by next year to create an encrypted email service that could serve as an alternative to Gmail and Yahoo!, which according to Snowden-leaked documents are among U.S. tech giants that have collaborated closely with the NSA.
"Brazil intends to increase its independent Internet connections with other countries," Rousseff's office said in an emailed response to questions from The Associated Press on its plans.
It cited a "common understanding" between Brazil and the European Union on data privacy, and said "negotiations are underway in South America for the deployment of land connections between all nations." It said Brazil plans to boost investment in home-grown technology and buy only software and hardware that meet government data privacy specifications.
While the plans' technical details are pending, experts say they will be costly for Brazil and ultimately can be circumvented. Just as people in China and Iran defeat government censors with tools such as "proxy servers," so could Brazilians bypass their government's controls.
International spies, not just from the United States, also will adjust, experts said. Laying cable to Europe won't make Brazil safer, they say. The NSA has reportedly tapped into undersea telecoms cables for decades.
Meinrath and others argue that what's needed instead are strong international laws that hold nations accountable for guaranteeing online privacy.
"There's nothing viable that Brazil can really do to protect its citizenry without changing what the U.S. is doing," he said.
Matthew Green, a Johns Hopkins computer security expert, said Brazil won't protect itself from intrusion by isolating itself digitally. It will also be discouraging technological innovation, he said, by encouraging the entire nation to use a state-sponsored encrypted email service.
"It's sort of like a Soviet socialism of computing," he said, adding that the U.S. "free-for-all model works better."
___http://news.yahoo.com/brazil-looks-break-us-centric-internet-040702309.html

Monday, September 9, 2013

Left with nothing | The Washington Post

JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:     
On the day Bennie Coleman lost his house, the day armed U.S. marshals came to his door and ordered him off the property, he slumped in a folding chair across the street and watched the vestiges of his 76 years hauled to the curb.
Movers carted out his easy chair, his clothes, his television. Next came the things that were closest to his heart: his Marine Corps medals and photographs of his dead wife, Martha. The duplex in Northeast Washington that Coleman bought with cash two decades earlier was emptied and shuttered. By sundown, he had nowhere to go.
All because he didn’t pay a $134 property tax bill.


The retired Marine sergeant lost his house on that summer day two years ago through a tax lien sale — an obscure program run by D.C. government that enlists private investors to help the city recover unpaid taxes.
For decades, the District placed liens on properties when homeowners failed to pay their bills, then sold those liens at public auctions to mom-and-pop investors who drew a profit by charging owners interest on top of the tax debt until the money was repaid.
But under the watch of local leaders, the program has morphed into a predatory system of debt collection for well-financed, out-of-town companies that turned $500 delinquencies into $5,000 debts — then foreclosed on homes when families couldn’t pay, a Washington Post investigation found.
As the housing market soared, the investors scooped up liens in every corner of the city, then started charging homeowners thousands in legal fees and other costs that far exceeded their original tax bills, with rates for attorneys reaching $450 an hour.
 
Families have been forced to borrow or strike payment plans to save their homes.
Others weren’t as lucky. Tax lien purchasers have foreclosed on nearly 200 houses since 2005 and are now pressing to take 1,200 more, many owned free and clear by families for generations.
Investors also took storefronts, parking lots and vacant land — about 500 properties in all, or an average of one a week. In dozens of cases, the liens were less than $500.
Coleman, struggling with dementia, was among those who lost a home. His debt had snowballed to $4,999 — 37 times the original tax bill. Not only did he lose his $197,000 house, but he also was stripped of the equity because tax lien purchasers are entitled to everything, trumping even mortgage companies.
“This is destroying lives,” said Christopher Leinberger, a distinguished scholar and research professor of urban real estate at George Washington University.
Officials at the D.C. Office of Tax and Revenue said that without tax sales, property owners wouldn’t feel compelled to pay their bills.
“The tax sale is the last resort. It’s also the first resort — it’s the only way in the statute to collect debt,” said deputy chief financial officer Stephen Cordi.
But the District, a hotbed for the tax lien industry, has done little to shield its most vulnerable homeowners from unscrupulous operators.
Foreclosures have upended families in some of the city’s most distressed neighborhoods. Houses were taken from a housekeeper, a department store clerk, a seamstress and even the estates of dead people. The hardest hit: elderly homeowners, who were often sick or dying when tax lien purchasers seized their houses.
One 65-year-old flower shop owner lost his Northwest Washington home of 40 years after a company from Florida paid his back taxes — $1,025 — and then took the house through foreclosure while he was in hospice, dying of cancer. A 95-year-old church choir leader lost her family home to a Maryland investor over a tax debt of $44.79 while she was struggling with Alzheimer’s in a nursing home.
Other cities and states took steps to curb abuses, such as capping the fees, safeguarding houses owned by the elderly or scrapping tax sales altogether and instead collecting the money themselves.
“Where is the justice? They’re taking people’s lives,” said Beverly Smalls, whose elderly aunt lost her home in Northeast Washington. “It’s just not right.”
In a 10-month investigation, The Post chronicled years of breakdowns and abuses in a program that puts at risk one of the most fundamental possessions in American life.
  • Of the nearly 200 homeowners who lost their properties in recent years, one in three had liens of less than $1,000.
  • More than half of the foreclosures were in the city’s two poorest wards, 7 and 8, where dozens of owners were forced to leave their homes just months before purchasers sold them. One foreclosed on a brick house near the Maryland border with a $287 lien and sold it less than eight weeks later for $129,000.
  • More than 40 houses were taken by companies whose representatives were caught breaking laws in other states to win liens.
  • Instead of stepping in, the D.C. tax office created more problems by selling nearly 1,900 liens by mistake in the past six years — even after owners paid their taxes — forcing unsuspecting families into legal battles that have lasted for years. One 64-year-old woman spent two years fighting to save her home in Northwest after the tax office erroneously charged her $8.61 in interest.
  •  
    Every Wednesday, homeowners plead their cases at D.C. Superior Court, where they are pitted against industry lawyers who have filed for more than 7,000 foreclosure cases in the past eight years alone. Families pace the hallways waiting for their names to be called in last-ditch efforts to rescue their homes.
    “This is highway robbery,” said Brenda Adjetey, who showed up in court last week to protect her home in Southeast Washington after her $1,100 tax bill nearly quadrupled because of legal fees charged by the investor.
    Tax lien purchasers defend the industry, saying that most people who buy liens are local investors just trying to earn interest — not take homes — and that the law gives owners six months to repay their debts before a foreclosure case can be filed.
    “This is an opportunity to make some money, but it is also an opportunity for the city to get paid and to help its citizens,” said Richard Cockerill, a veteran bidder from Virginia.
    In a written statement, the tax office added, “Property owners are given multiple opportunities to pay both before and after the tax sale.”
    Officials also said the tax office has made improvements to the program in recent years, including additional warnings to homeowners before liens are sold, and the office recently stopped selling liens on houses for less than $1,000.
    But officials acknowledge that limit was set to manage the caseload and is not a permanent policy change.
    At a public hearing this past October, housing advocates presented a list of reforms to the D.C. Council, including capping the fees charged by purchasers and offering payment plans to struggling homeowners. But the changes were never made.
    “That’s a failure on the part of government,” said Stephen Fuller, director of the Center for Regional Analysis at George Mason University. “This has punitive consequences. People have been damaged.”

    Outsiders come to buy liens

     

    Liens are generally sold the year after a homeowner fails to pay a tax bill, for the same amount as the debt. Homeowners receive several warnings before their liens are put up at annual auctions.
    Once a lien is sold, owners have six months to repay the investor with interest. If that does not happen, the investor can move to foreclose.
    For years, the auctions came and went with little fanfare, drawing local investors who would plunk down a few hundred dollars to buy up liens in neighborhoods they knew well. Most were looking to earn the interest, and if there was a foreclosure, it was handled by the tax office.
    But the work overwhelmed the agency, and in 2001, city leaders made a critical change: They told investors to head directly to court to file a foreclosure case.
    The move empowered investors to start charging legal fees and court costs — a game changer that allowed them to turn minor delinquencies into insurmountable debts.
    Companies from Florida, Illinois, Maryland and New York came to town, prepared to spend millions.
    In 2007, more than 150 purchasers spent five days competing for 2,000 liens, first on properties downtown near the Capitol, then Georgetown, followed by Dupont Circle, Chinatown and finally the neighborhoods near the Anacostia River, long stricken by poverty.
    Foreclosures since 2005
    • Residential
    • Vacant
    • Commercial and other
    Pending foreclosures








    4 20 50 100+
    Search for an address or neighborhood

    GO

    In the District of Columbia:

    509
    foreclosures since 2005
    1,598
    open cases in court
    Of the 1,598 open foreclosure cases in court, 1,184 are residential; 201 are vacant; and 213 are categorized as other.
    Source: Post analysis of data from D.C. Superior Court, D.C. Recorder of Deeds, U.S. Census.
    When it was over, just six companies had swept the bidding, snaring two-thirds of the liens, which totaled $5 million, on properties worth more than $666 million.
    One of those purchasers was under federal investigation at the time for rigging tax auctions in Maryland, where he was suspected of scheming to win liens — then demanding excessive fees from homeowners. Lawyers for a second firm would also come under investigation in the same case.
    Their companies and others bought into every ward of the District in 2007, including Deanwood, one of the city’s oldest predominantly African American neighborhoods. On long stretches of Dix Street, where the recession hit hard and lingered, 33 liens were sold between 2005 and 2008, on properties scattered amid food banks and “Cash 4 Gold” signs.
    Across the city, the rate of foreclosure cases has nearly doubled in the past five years — in a single week in January, tax lien companies filed more than 180 cases. Of the 13,000 liens sold since 2005, more than half have ended up in court.
    With no caps on fees, families have paid a steep price, facing bills for legal fees and court costs often more than triple their original tax debts, The Post found. Rates for the attorneys hired by the tax lien companies have reached $450 an hour.
    Even the smallest expenses have been passed on — including the paper that ordered property owners to court at 25 cents per page. One attorney billed for preparing the bill itself — $25.
    Time and again, the bills came without receipts or breakdowns justifying the costs.
    “I just don’t know what he’s trying to charge me for,” said longtime community activist Barbara Morgan, 80, standing outside the courtroom earlier this year with a $2,700 legal bill that doubled the tax debt on her home of 50 years. “It’s ridiculous.”
    Local judges have taken purchasers to task. One was so critical of the fees charged by Aeon Financial of Chicago, he slashed them in half last year. Aeon wanted $6,300 in fees for a $1,680 tax lien.
    A senior attorney billed at $450 an hour. A junior attorney charged $325. Legal assistants tacked on $110 an hour. Plus, there was $800 in expenses, including $27.60 for “dismissal costs.”
    “Unreasonable,” Judge Joseph E. Beshouri said in his ruling.
    In 2009, D.C. Attorney General Peter J. Nickles also stepped in, seeking an injunction against Aeon over fees that he called “unlawful” and “predatory.”
    “Aeon’s excessive attorney’s fee demands are likely to result in at least some homeowners not being able to redeem homes,” according to the motion.
    In one case, Steve Segears, who lives in the house his father bought after World War II, was charged $5,500 in fees by Aeon, nearly double his $2,900 tax bill.
    “Enough is enough,” Michael J. Wilson, Segears’s attorney, wrote to the court. “The Aeon juggernaut keeps rolling along by demanding payment of unreasonable and extortionate attorneys’ fees and other alleged expenses, including those which have not actually been ‘incurred.’ ”
    Aeon did not respond to repeated calls and letters seeking comment.
    Other places acknowledged abuses years ago and took steps to guard against them. New York City won’t allow tax liens to be sold on homes owned by low-income seniors and the disabled, as well as veterans. Some counties in Michigan have scrapped tax lien sales altogether and collect the money themselves. Maryland, fearing that taxpayers were being gouged, limits the legal fees to $1,500.
    Most homeowners are in no position to fight and rely on the government to protect them from unfair practices, said Howard Liggett, former director of the National Tax Lien Association, who has spoken out nationally against excessive fees.
    But D.C. leaders have not provided key protections, including caps on fees.
    “It’s embarrassing,” said Liggett, who is familiar with the District’s tax auctions and bidders. “You’re always going to have unscrupulous [investors]. You’ve got to self-police.”

    Long battles over bills


    Threatened with mounting fees, some families simply gave up. In court files and interviews, they described large bills and long battles with lawyers while interest grew on their tax debts.
    “We just didn’t have the money to fight these people,” said Michael McRae, who tried unsuccessfully to save his brother’s house from a tax-lien firm from Florida.
    In the past eight years, investors have foreclosed on a condominium just a few blocks from the U.S. Capitol and another just down the street from the Embassy of Peru, a single-family home near Rock Creek Park and dozens of houses in poor neighborhoods along the Anacostia River.
    The Post found investors have taken nearly 200 homes since 2005, assessed at $39 million. They sold most of them, sometimes within weeks, after paying off any back taxes or city fines.

    One of the most aggressive investors was Heartwood, whose lawyers were investigated and disbarred as a result of Maryland’s criminal bid-rigging case. Formerly a subsidiary of Florida’s BankAtlantic Bancorp, Heartwood has taken more than 20 houses through foreclosure and sold them all, including a brick duplex in Northeast Washington with a $535 lien for $169,610.
    One of the houses was owned by Michael McRae’s brother, Thomas, a flower-shop owner, who was in and out of a coma and under hospice care while Heartwood was pressing to take his house over what began as a $1,025 tax debt. Thomas McRae died in June 2006 — three months after a judge approved the foreclosure.
    Family members found out and fought back, saying no one told them about the lien or foreclosure.
    Heartwood eventually paid the family $80,000 to settle the case and quickly sold the brick house on a bustling corner of Sherman Avenue NW for $175,000. Longtime neighbors still recall how Thomas McRae had filled the sidewalk with flowers.
    “We’re just regular people, and we don’t have $200,000 to fight a big organization from Florida,” his brother said.
    In a written statement, the tax office said the $1,025 tax bill was “not a small debt.” A spokesperson for Heartwood declined to discuss the foreclosure cases but said the company is no longer buying tax liens in the District and Maryland.
    Bennie Coleman was ousted from his house two years ago in a flurry of foreclosures that swept the poor neighborhoods of Ward 7.
    The retired Vietnam veteran bought the tidy brick duplex in Northeast for $57,500 with life insurance money that he received when his wife died of breast cancer in 1988.
    Known in his working-class neighborhood as “Tops,” he spent two decades in the house without a mortgage. But in recent years, Coleman began showing signs of dementia — he would forget to pay bills or buy food. His next-door neighbor would often bring him plates of chicken and carrots.
    In 2006, he forgot to pay a $134 tax bill, prompting the city to place a lien on the home and add $183 in interest and penalties. His son paid the $317 bill in 2009, records show, but that wasn’t enough.
    The Maryland company that had bought the lien had already gone to court to put a foreclosure in motion. To lift the lien, the company’s lawyer was demanding steep legal fees and expenses— $4,999.

    Coleman’s son couldn’t pay and wrote to the court for help: “I would hate for him at his age to lose his home.” One payment was made for $700 in 2009, but when no additional payments followed, the court approved the foreclosure in June 2010.
    His son couldn’t be reached for comment. In the summer of 2011, federal marshals showed up at the door when Coleman refused to leave.
    “He had no clue what was going on,” said neighbor Patricia Johnson. “I went over and told my mom, ‘Looks like they are going to get Tops out.’ ”
    That night, he slept in a chair on the front porch.
    The court later appointed a conservator, who told The Post that Coleman was incapable of responding to the emergency unfolding in his life, including showing up in court to fight for his house.
    “He had no chance,” said attorney Robert Bunn. “He has dementia. He did not understand the ramifications of what was going to happen to him.”

    The Maryland company that took Coleman’s house sold it for $71,000 two months after evicting him. The company was owned by Steven Berman, who was convicted in 2008 in the Maryland bid-rigging case. He declined to comment. The law firm for Berman’s company said it was willing to reduce Coleman’s bill to $3,500 but could not reach him.
    The tax office would not comment on the case, saying only that the lien would “not have been sold if the tax sale were today” because it was less than $1,000, the agency’s current threshold.
    Coleman said he thought he would stay in his house for many more years, sipping cold drinks on the porch and talking to neighbors over the fence. Now, he’s in a group home one mile from the home that is no longer his.
    On an overcast morning earlier this year, he walked past the old house, now boarded up, on the way to the corner store to buy margarine and a bag of sugar. He looked back briefly, then turned away.
    “I have nothing,” he said.
     http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2013/09/08/left-with-nothing/

Saturday, September 7, 2013

Stevie Wonder takes on Texas: Changing education on slavery is ‘unacceptable’ | The Raw Story

Stevie Wonder takes on Texas: Changing education on slavery is ‘unacceptable’ | The Raw Story
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
Singer Stevie Wonder took a moment during a panel discussion hosted by MSNBC’s Al Sharpton on Friday to criticize the Texas Board of Education’s attempt to gloss over the U.S. slave trade.
“We really have to confront the educational system. Every single American must feel and know that they were a part of this United States,” Wonder said. “I think, that [school] books have to be rewritten — the whole notion of changing what happened during slavery time to saying it’s a fantasy — Texas — is unacceptable.”
The board approved the redesignation of the slave trade as the “Transatlantic Slave Trade,” after flirting with the name “Atlantic Triangluar Trade” as another possible name for the industry.
Though he clarified that he did not want to offend his fans in Texas, Wonder said, “I just feel that we can’t act like something that truly happened didn’t happen. It’s real, confront it. Deal with it and make the difference by changing it.”
Wonder’s remarks occur at the 4:10 mark of this panel discussion, aired Friday on MSNBC, below.
 <object width="420" height="245" id="msnbc10fd6c" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=10,0,0,0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" /><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=52943851&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed name="msnbc10fd6c" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" width="420" height="245" FlashVars="launch=52943851&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" allowscriptaccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object><p style="font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #999; margin-top: 5px; background: transparent; text-align: center; width: 420px;">Visit NBCNews.com for <a style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;" href="http://www.nbcnews.com">breaking news</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">world news</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">news about the economy</a></p>     
Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Ariel Castro, Ohio man who held three women captive for a decade, commits suicide - The Globe and Mail

Ariel Castro, Ohio man who held three women captive for a decade, commits suicide - The Globe and Mail
JohnButts@JBMedia Reports:
Ohio corrections officials say Ariel Castro who held three women captive in his home for nearly a decade has committed suicide at a state prison facility.
Spokeswoman JoEllen Smith says 53-year-old Castro was found hanging in his cell around 9:20 p.m. Tuesday at the Correctional Reception Center in Orient. Prison medical staff performed CPR before Castro was transported to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead.
The three women disappeared separately between 2002 and 2004, when they were 14, 16 and 20 years old. They escaped May 6, when one of the women broke part of a door and yelled to neighbours for help. Castro was arrested that evening.
Castro was sentenced Aug. 1 to life in prison plus 1,000 years on his guilty plea to 937 counts including kidnapping and rape.
 http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/ariel-castro-ohio-man-who-held-three-women-captive-for-a-decade-commits-suicide/article14103659/?cmpid=rss1

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

» Denominational Diversity in North America: Why Are There So Many Denominations? Theological Matters

» Denominational Diversity in North America: Why Are There So Many Denominations? Theological Matters
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:

Denominational Diversity in North America: Why Are There So Many Denominations?

Two hundred years ago frontier revivalist Barton Stone was fed up with Presbyterianism. He found the denomination too theological, too elitist, and out of touch with the common frontier folk he ministered to in southern Kentucky. His biggest problem was that he believed Presbyterianism was not biblical. To Stone, pure Christianity must be built solely upon a plain reading of Scripture, and as he surveyed the Protestant denominations of his day he concluded that they all were contaminated with human traditions. He thus founded a new group that would not be another denomination but merely an organization of biblical believers bound together to worship God according to scriptural guidelines. To capture their anti-denominational spirit, they simply called themselves “Christians.”
Stone was not alone. Other groups in America’s early decades embraced similar ideals. Alexander Campbell, for instance, founded a movement known as “Disciples.” In New England, Abner Jones and Elias Smith formed a group of “Christians” from former Baptists. And in Virginia, James O’Kelly’s Republican Methodists sought a non-hierarchical, more biblical version of Methodism. In time, the two largest of these new groups—Stone’s Christians and Campbell’s Disciples—merged in 1831 to form what would become the Disciples of Christ, a movement known for its commitment to baptismal regeneration and weekly celebration of the Lord’s Supper. Ironically, what was intended to be a denomination-less movement of “mere Christians” wound up forming another denomination in the eyes of most onlookers.

Why do denominations form? Why are there so many of them?

These are complex questions with even more complex answers. Every denomination has its own unique mix of factors that influenced its origins. At the risk of over-simplifying, we can identify several of these factors that led to many denominations:
  • Fresh Biblical Insight: A denomination will form when a group of Christians discerns a teaching in Scripture that other Christians had previously overlooked. The new group will find the scriptural teaching so compelling that they find it necessary to form a new group of Christians. In time this group forms a new denomination. During the Reformation, Protestants found justification by faith so central to apostolic Christianity that they could not remain in fellowship with the broader Roman Catholic Church.
  • Biblical Primitivism: This is a subset of the last point. When a group consciously attempts to reduplicate certain features of the primitive, New Testament church, then historians sometimes call that group “primitivist.” Over the centuries different denominations emerged as they sought to reduplicate an aspect of New Testament Christianity which they considered to be central for the church.
    • Baptists sought to reduplicate the pattern of believer’s baptism found in the New Testament.
    • Congregationalists sought to reduplicate the New Testament pattern of autonomous churches operating directly under the apostolic authority of the Word.
    • Early Pentecostals sought to reduplicate the New Testament practice of speaking in tongues.
  • Political Changes: Sometimes denominations form because of changes related to the political climate of the host nation.
    • To a significant degree, Anglicanism arose when Henry VIII found it expedient for the English church to break ties with the Roman Catholic Church.
    • In contrast, the absence of an official state church in early America allowed for the rise to numerous denominations, some orthodox, others heretical.
These are just some of the reasons that denominations have emerged throughout in the history of the church.
With these observations we begin a new series on “Denominational Diversity in North America.” Over the next year we will be taking brief tours of the prominent denominations that appear in our North American context. Our goal is to take one denomination a month and explore its origins, distinctive views, history, and main leaders.
Due to constraints of space, the entries will be limited to description only; we will not be offering a detailed response to these groups from a Baptist perspective.
  • First, we will examine denominations that formed in England prior to the founding of America: Anglicanism, Presbyterianism, Quakers, and Methodism.
  • Next, we will turn our attention to those denominations that emerged directly on American soil: the Disciples of Christ, Seventh Day Adventism, Mormonism, and Pentecostalism.
As this list indicates, some of these groups are far more orthodox than others; Mormonism, for instance, is outright heretical. It is our hope that these brief tours will help us understand the diverse religious landscape around us so that we can be better witnesses in our complex world.
__________________________
Robert Caldwell serves as assistant professor of church history at Southwestern Seminary. His research focuses on the history and theology of Evangelicalism in North America, with specialties in American Awakenings and the theology of Jonathan Edwards. Currently he is writing his third book, Theology of the American Revivalists: The Theology of the Great Awakenings from Edwards to Finney (forthcoming from IVP Academic).
 http://www.theologicalmatters.com/index.php/2013/08/29/denominational-diversity-in-north-america-why-are-there-so-many-denominations/

Monday, September 2, 2013

Fast- food workers protests: Union images of the labor force don’t match reality. - Slate Magazine

Fast- food workers protests: Union images of the labor force don’t match reality. - Slate Magazine
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
“If you work for a living, you’re labor, too!” So read the text of a full-page newspaper advertisement sponsored by the American Federation of Labor  in the spring of 1947. As the anti-union Taft-Hartley Act was wending its way through Congress, the AFL tried to convince the general public that it represented everyone, not just unionized workers.
This was a tough sell—and it still is. The chosen face of organized labor has long been the noble manufacturing worker, often one who produced machinery for American war efforts. This worker was white and male, he was his family’s sole breadwinner, and he probably wore overalls and muscles. Long after the AFL’s 1947 appeal, he remained the quintessential American laborer of the postwar period.

A Congress of Industrial Organizations cartoon from 1948
A Congress of Industrial Organizations cartoon from 1948

Courtesy of Reuther Library, Wayne State University.
Successful branding efforts by the AFL and the Congress of Industrial Organizations, which joined forces in 1955, helped win both public support and more favorable contracts for their members. But the campaigns also carried hidden costs. The indelible image of the blue-collar working man now competes with the more diverse demographics of the actual American working class. That cognitive dissonance around what labor “should” look like is part of the challenge facing fast-food workers demonstrating for higher pay, better working conditions, and the right to unionize this Labor Day.

Advertisement
The demands of fast-food workers in some 60 cities across the country aren’t extreme or unusual. We might imagine a steelworker, autoworker, or miner making similar demands. But the burger flipper at McDonald’s or the cashier at Wendy’s doesn’t have a century-long heritage of imagery celebrating their contributions to the American economy. It’s harder to romanticize the work of service occupations, which employ nearly 18 percent of the American workforce, compared with about 9 percent in manufacturing jobs—a gap that will continue to widen as the service sector expands and manufacturing shrinks.
Yet food service workers are in far worse shape than those who work in manufacturing. The average hourly earnings of workers in nonsupervisory positions is just more than $11 an hour, with food-preparation and serving workers taking home less than $9 an hour, on average. (By contrast, steelworkers receive more than $24 an hour on average, and those in motor vehicle manufacturing are paid more than $27 an hour.) Fewer than 2.5 percent of food-service and accommodation workers are represented by a union, which would likely improve their wages: Unionized full-time food workers make $585 per week on average, compared to $424 for non-union workers.
In the postwar period, union leaders would rally pubic support by stressing that the men of the labor movement had mouths to feed. In a 1947 newspaper advertisement against Taft-Hartley, the CIO featured a picture of a young girl asking, “Why is my Pop worried?” The answer: He might have to go on relief, just as he did during the bad old days of the Depression. “These three are all tied together—families, unions and the United States of America,” the ad argued.

From the April 14, 1947, edition of CIO News
From the April 14, 1947, edition of CIO News Courtesy of Tamiment Library, New York University
Like “Pop,” the fast-food workers demonstrating across the country are often family breadwinners; 40 percent are 25 or older, and about 25 percent of them have children, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research. But these breadwinner parents don’t look like Pop in many other respects. For one thing, 58 percent of food preparation workers are women. For another, among employed men, 22 percent of blacks and Latinos work in service jobs, compared with just 14 percent of whites. (Among employed women, 28 percent of blacks and fullly one-third of Latinas are in service, compared with 20 percent of white women.) And unlike Pop, they may not be big and brawny, even if the work they do is physically demanding.

Herbert Block cartoon
A Herbert Block cartoon from the Feb. 19, 1955, edition of the Garden City Newsday following the merger of the AFL and CIO. Courtesy of Reuther Library, Wayne State Universityhttp://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2013/09/fast_food_workers_protests_union_images_of_the_labor_force_don_t_match_reality.html

The gap between our entrenched image of the working class and its demographic reality creates a paradox. On the one hand, it’s clear that unionizing would make the lives of millions of service-industry workers better. On the other, if unions were built to protect the industrial worker in overalls, it’s easy to see why the public might think that as those workers become fewer and farther between, then union power should shrink accordingly.
That perception needs to be shattered for fast food workers to win higher pay, better working conditions, and the right to unionize. As we celebrate Labor Day this year, we should rethink our concept of labor—and of who really does the laboring

Hezbollah mobilises ahead of potential US Syria strike - Yahoo! News

Hezbollah mobilises ahead of potential US Syria strike - Yahoo! News
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
Lebanon's Shiite Hezbollah group, a close ally of the Syrian regime, is redeploying its forces ahead of possible US strikes on Damascus, according to witnesses in Lebanon.
The reports come as the daily Al-Akhbar, which is close to both Hezbollah and the Syrian regime, said on Monday that the group had "called on all its officers and members to man their positions."
Residents speaking to AFP in the southern Lebanese city of Tyre said there appeared to be a general mobilisation of the group's members, even if such a movement was not being publicly discussed.
Many Hezbollah fighters have disappeared from local villages in the last five days, though strict security measures around group headquarters and checkpoints have remained in place, residents said.
The situation is the same in the Bekaa Valley of eastern Lebanon, a stronghold of the organisation.
Residents said fighters, including gunners, had left their regular posts, and switched off their mobile phones to ensure they could not be traced.
In the southern suburbs of the capital Beirut, also considered a Hezbollah bastion, teenagers have replaced more experienced fighters at checkpoints inspecting cars entering the district.
A Hezbollah spokesman declined to comment on the reported redeployment of the group's forces.
On Monday, Al-Akhbar also reported that the "Syrian army has mobilised units that have not participated until now in the conflict."
"It has established an operations room... with Hezbollah and the units in charge of missiles are at an unprecedented level of alert," the daily added.
"The Islamic resistance (Hezbollah) has called on all its officers and members to man their positions," the newspaper reported.
The reported mobilisation comes after US President Barack Obama said he favoured the use of military action against Syria in response to an alleged chemical weapons attack in the suburbs of Damascus.
But Obama has said he will seek approval from Congress for any strikes in response to the attack, for which the Syrian regime denies responsibility.
Hezbollah is a close ally of the Syrian regime, and has dispatched fighters to battle alongside Syrian troops and against rebels seeking to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad.
Wadah Charara, an expert on the group, says it commands around 30,000 fighters, including 10,000 with extensive combat experience.
Between 800 and 1,2000 Hezbollah fighters are thought to have taken part in the Syrian regime's battle to recapture the town of Qusayr in central Homs province earlier this year.
 http://news.yahoo.com/hezbollah-mobilises-ahead-potential-us-syria-strike-191153343.html

White Supremacist Ex-Con Caught With Arsenal of Weapons

White Supremacist Ex-Con Caught With Arsenal of Weapons
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
What was supposed to be a bust for counterfeit sports jerseys turned out to be so much more, after federal agents raided the home and business of Richard Schmidt. The Ohio resident, who is an ex-con, was discovered to have the kind of firearm stash that your favorite rapper only raps about, according to the Cleveland Plain Dealer.
But what began with investigators chasing box loads of counterfeit jerseys and baseball caps ended in one of the most perplexing seizures of weapons in Ohio: Authorities in December nabbed 18 guns that included assault rifles, more than 40,000 rounds of ammunition and body armor from Schmidt, a felon who killed a man and wounded two other people in 1989.
Investigators also found possible links to white supremacist groups. He had a VHS tape of a national meeting of the National Socialist Movement and stickers from the National Alliance, according to an inventory of seized items filed in U.S. District Court in Toledo. Agents also obtained notes with the names of Jewish and NAACP leaders in Detroit.
The names of the black leaders in Schmidt's notes were not released, but there is also evidence to suggest that Schmidt is a racist who would target Jews and members of ethnic groups. The man he was convicted of killing in 1989 was Hispanic.
Schmidt returned to Toledo in 2003 after getting out of prison. State incorporation records show he soon formed a nonprofit, the Vinland Preservation League, designed to push environmental and historical conservation and preservation.
The name of the nonprofit suggests more about Schmidt. In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate groups, made note of a profile on yahoo.com involving a Rick Schmidt from Toledo, who went by vinlander101. Photos from the profile match Schmidt.
The law center lists the Vinlanders Social Club as a rogue group that "had a reputation for drinking, brawling and following a racist version of Odinism, a form of ancient paganism practiced by Vikings."
 http://www.theroot.com/buzz/white-supremacist-ex-con-caught-arsenal-weapons

Forward Progressives — President Obama Just Made a Brilliant Move On Possible U.S. Military Intervention in Syria

Forward Progressives — President Obama Just Made a Brilliant Move On Possible U.S. Military Intervention in Syria
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
The big news of the day is President Obama’s comments about his plans to seek approval from Congress for military intervention in Syria.
Now, for many liberals this was the last thing they wanted to hear.  For Libertarians it’s just “more proof” that President Obama is no different than George W. Bush.
But for Republicans, what the heck are they going to say?  In short—nothing.  They can’t.
And that’s why this move is brilliant.
The President knows Syria is going to get much worse before it gets better.  I’ve frequently seen the argument, “With so much bloodshed already, do we really need U.S. bombs causing more?”  Well, that’s not really an accurate way to look at it.  Some others may ask, “Is the loss of 1,000 lives worth saving 100,000?”  It’s a rhetorical question that really has no right or wrong answer, but should definitely cause you to pause for a moment and think about the consequences of any choice we make.


Now some might say “All life is sacred, how can you value any one life over another?”  And that’s true.  But people are going to die in Syria regardless if we get involved or not.  Over 120,000 have died in nearly 3 years of their civil war.  Our involvement is meant to try and curb some of that death.  Nobody is saying if we get involved that there won’t be the loss of innocent lives.  It’s war; horrific decisions are made all the time.  As I’ve said plenty of times, there is no such thing as a “clean war.”  If we get involved it’s meant to try and expedite an end to the seemingly endless bloodshed.  And yes, that means our bombs and missiles will most likely kill innocents.  Like I said, it’s war.  Is it better if we did nothing and simply allowed thousands to die anyway?  Is an innocent death less of a tragedy because they were killed by Bashar al-Assad’s weapons?
But I still don’t know how I feel about our possible involvement.  And that’s not what I see as brilliant in Obama’s plans.
What I think he did that’s absolutely genius is he’s put the burden on Congress to decide what we’ll do.  He put his stamp of approval on what he feels we should do, but now he’s sent it on to Congress.
While Republicans harped on about the “tyrant” President Obama who would circumvent Congress to wage war, he laughed right in their face and endorsed military action — but only with Congressional approval.
Now what can Republicans say?  If they don’t support military involvement, then don’t approve it and that’ll be the end of it.  If they do, then he will.
But wait, endorsing our involvement in Syria would mean Republicans would have to support something President Obama has endorsed.  Which is something they just don’t do.
However, if they choose not to endorse action in Syria, how can they continue to claim to be the party that’s “hard on terror?”  Isn’t this the party that voted for Bush, McCain and Romney — all men who governed and campaigned on preventative war?
Doesn’t curbing violence in Syria qualify as preventative war?
Furthermore, don’t they try and paint President Obama as “weak on terror?”  Well, he’s made a bold (and unpopular with liberals) stance on Syria to hopefully end the violence and take out a corrupt government that has probably used chemical weapons on its own people.
So now who’s going to be “weak on terror?”
But again, for us to get involved in Syria, Republicans would have to endorse something President Obama supports.
And we know most of them won’t do this — and so does he.  That’s what I think makes this absolutely brilliant.
He can take a bold call for his support of military action, something that will anger many within his own party, and force Republicans to either look weak on terror or support something he’s publicly said he supports.
No matter which decision they make, it’s going to make them look weak.
Their whole bet had been that Obama would either back off and look weak himself, or bypass Congress and go into Syria without support.
Well, he did neither.  Essentially, he called their bluff and put it on Congress (more specifically Republicans) to make that call.
But I don’t think for even a second he believes he’ll get approval from Congress, because Republicans have had the political strategy the last few years of, “Whatever Obama does, just do the opposite.”  I always use the joke that if Obama came out in support of oxygen, Republicans would suffocate.
So while liberals can get up in arms over Obama publicly endorsing military involvement in Syria, they always tend to forget that he’s a brilliant chess player.
Remember this past spring when liberals threw a fit over his budget proposal that included a chained CPI?  The outrage was ridiculous.  I told these people who were overreacting to calm down, that Obama had a plan.  Then at the end of the day, almost exactly what I said would happen—did.  Republicans turned on the chained CPI proposal (something they had actually pushed for) and the budget never even sniffed the possibility of being passed.
Which most of the American people blamed Congressional Republicans for — something I theorized was Obama’s plan with his budget all along.
Now he’s doing the same thing with his decision on Syria.  He made his stand, called their bluff (not going it without Congressional support as the right-wing media had fear mongered on for weeks) and has decided to let Congress decide.


And if the last few years of Congressional Republican behavior is any indication, we stand absolutely no chance at getting involved in Syria.
Which will be truly ironic coming from the party which started our last 2 wars and had its last two presidential candidates run on the promise of being “tough on terror.”  So I guess in 2016, whoever Republicans pick to run won’t be able to use that line to pander to their voters.
Unless Republicans do what they haven’t done since Obama became President — support something he’s endorsed.  And I’m pretty sure Obama knew, with his comments today, that is something they just won’t do.
But at the end of the day, Republicans in Congress will have the tougher questions (and decision) to make — not President Obama.
He doesn’t need to worry about being re-elected, but they do.
 http://www.forwardprogressives.com/president-obama-just-made-a-brilliant-move-on-possible-u-s-military-intervention-in-syria/

Saturday, August 31, 2013

The 'Dream' Is Still Alive | Michael Steele

The 'Dream' Is Still Alive | Michael Steele
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
I had the pleasure of running into Donna Brazile the other day and talking about the 50th Anniversary programs and celebrations for the 1963 March on Washington.
She noted that she had been asked by Coretta Scott King to serve as the National Youth Coordinator for the 20th anniversary celebrations in 1983 and showed me a vintage poster proclaiming "We Still Have A Dream - Jobs Peace Freedom". Our shared remembrances and that poster got me thinking about how much America has changed, and how important Dr. King's Dream was for a nation and a young black boy coming of age in late 20th century America.
The America that convenes on the Mall in 2013 to celebrate and commemorate Dr. King's "I Have a Dream" speech is a very different America from the one Dr. King spoke to in August, 1963.
While the vice-like grip of Jim Crow laws were slowly weakening across the country and "For Whites Only" signs no longer greeted those who sought relief at nearby water fountains on the Mall that hot August day, Dr. King surely knew that this moment would be less about the past and more about the future. His words would not only speak to those assembled, but would also press upon future generations the need to "take up the cause of freedom".
In some respects, that iconic moment which launched an historic movement closed a particularly dark chapter in America's history: a chapter which chronicled the burden of slavery and institutionalized discrimination; a chapter which imprinted segregated public accommodations and schools on the very soul of American life; a chapter in which the foundation of America--freedom and equality--was rocked by lynchings and fire bombings.
In that moment, Dr. King turned the page to reveal a new chapter for America--one we are still writing today--steeped in hope, yes, but desperate for opportunity. So, where are we fifty years later? How much of the Dream has become reality; and how much of our reality has faded the Dream?
We've elected a black man president of the United States and yet a black boy is still "profiled" to be a threat and killed because of it. African Americans have reached the pinnacles of industry and commerce, entertainment, sports and politics and yet black unemployment sits at 13.4 percent and the poverty rate exceeds 28 percent (46 percent for a single mother with children under 18). The black family and the black church--the "social safety net" of the black community--anchored the African American experience as we marched off plantations and ultimately on Washington.
But now 67 percent of black children live with one parent (black children are seven times more likely to have a parent in prison) and 68 percent of black babies are born to unwed mothers. African Americans have overcome the terror of police dogs and water hoses but find themselves three times more likely to be stopped, questioned and arrested on the streets of metropolitan America than Whites. The passage of the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act guaranteed political and civil opportunities for full participation at the ballot box, but many African Americans now find that access under reconsideration in the face of new voter registration and voter ID laws and recent Supreme Court decisions.
Dr. King's speech challenged the status quo of his time and now so must we. But we must first answer for our generation the question often asked of him: 'When will you be satisfied?'
As Dr. King would reply, "We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality. We can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities. We cannot be satisfied as long as the Negro's basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one. We can never be satisfied as long as our children are stripped of their selfhood and robbed of their dignity by signs stating "for whites only." We cannot be satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and a Negro in New York believes he has nothing for which to vote. No, no we are not satisfied and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream."
And yet today our actions at times belie the truth of Dr. King's response. Put another way: are we satisfied? By our perseverance and ingenuity, courage and determination we built this country. Have we, in the process of assimilation, forgotten that we still have what is required of us to rebuild our communities? It seems now we are willing to give it away--whether it's our political capital or economic power.
Do we not appreciate that if we are not satisfied then no one else can be satisfied for us?
The way others see us starts with how we see ourselves and how we express that to others. So, if we are willing to tolerate the killing of over 500 African Americans in a major metropolitan city in the course of one year--so will the rest of America. If we are willing to tolerate failing school systems and the continued poor education of our children--so will the rest of America. If we tolerate living in boarded-up neighborhoods or the redlining and "gentrification" of our communities that displace our parents and grandparents--so will the rest of America.
Fifty years later, our progress is measured by statistics, but it is also measured by our willingness to no longer be satisfied with the status quo and to make real the Dream for this and future generations. But even in this hour some ask "is the Dream still alive?"
The truth is the Dream did not die on a balcony at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee because the Dream lives in each one of us. That, more than anything else, is the true legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr.
 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-steele/the-dream-is-still-alive_b_3845365.html?utm_hp_ref=media&ir=Media